Extinction Bounties

Policy-based deterrence for the 21st century.

Policy-Research Disclaimer (click to close)

Extinction Bounties publishes theoretical economic and legal mechanisms intended to stimulate scholarly and public debate on catastrophic-risk governance. The site offers policy analysis and advocacy only in the sense of outlining possible legislative or contractual frameworks.

  • No Legal or Financial Advice. Nothing here should be treated as a substitute for qualified legal counsel, financial due-diligence, or regulatory guidance. Stakeholders remain responsible for ensuring their actions comply with the laws and professional standards of their own jurisdictions.
  • Exploratory & Personal Views. All scenarios, numerical examples and opinions are research hypotheses presented by the author in an academic capacity. They do not represent the views of the author’s employer, funding bodies, or any governmental authority.
  • Implementation Caveats. Any real-world adoption of these ideas would require democratic deliberation, statutory authority, and robust safeguards to prevent misuse. References to enforcement, penalties, or “bounties” are illustrative models, not instructions or invitations to engage in private policing or unlawful conduct.
  • No Warranty & Limited Liability. Content is provided “as is” without warranty of completeness or accuracy; the author disclaims liability for losses arising from reliance on this material.

By continuing beyond this notice you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and accepted these conditions.

Our 2-minute elevator pitch


What About Turning Yourself In?

In a Fine-Insured Bounty (FIB) system, criminals fund the very bounties that catch them. But what if someone decides to game the system—by turning themselves in?

On the surface, it might seem absurd. Why confess your own crime just to claim your own bounty? But in certain situations, this seemingly strange strategy actually makes perfect sense — once.

Scenario 1: The Inevitable Bust

Suppose you’ve committed an offense—say, you’ve been quietly running banned AI experiments—but now realize you’re about to get caught. Evidence is leaking, teammates are acting suspiciously, and you can feel the vultures bounty hunters triangulating your position as we speak.

In this situation, turning yourself in first is surprisingly rational:

The major downside? You now have an official record of wrongdoing. If you self-confessed to littering, prepare for your insurance premiums to spike. If you self-confessed to something more serious, like an actual extinction risk, prepare at the very least to never work in anything remotely close to that industry again — your mere presence would cause the company to suffer its own unacceptable insurance spike. Who needs precogs when past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior?

Scenario 2: The Mole

A much more cunning scenario involves someone deliberately infiltrating a criminal enterprise or dangerous project from the beginning, quietly amassing trust, insight, and evidence, and planning all along to blow the whistle.

Why might someone do this?

But, again, the drawback is significant: the stigma of having been involved at all. Insurers, employers, and bounty hunters now have your name flagged, making future activities subject to intense scrutiny. No matter how loudly you proclaim yourself to be a cunning mole who planned it from the start, it’s very hard to distinguish between a mole and an opportunist. Better aim big — you probably only have one shot!

Society Benefits from a Fast Crime-Justice Feedback Loop

It’s worth pointing out that the crimes we are interested in are fundamentally social harms, and that staying undetected is itself an additional social harm. Think, for example, of the families of loved ones who disappear mysteriously—all of the years, or decades, of agony about wondering whether they’re still out there, living under a different life, or whether the worst befell them—that’s a harm too, and a heavy one.

This isn’t a perspective that we feel is particularly vital to the kinds of crimes Extinction Bounties focuses on, but it is a real and valid one. We as innocent bystanders may often find ourselves preferring systems where criminals of certain stripes elect to turn themselves in as soon as possible, particularly when the crime is of a more abstract nature.

Conclusion: High-Risk, High-Reward

Turning yourself in under a FIB regime isn’t always foolish—or always brilliant. It’s an extreme strategy suited for cases where capture is either inevitable, or where infiltrating and exposing criminal operations promises massive personal upside.

Used wisely, it’s a uniquely powerful tool. Misused, it could permanently damage your professional standing. Either way, the very existence of this option highlights just how intricately balanced the incentives within a Fine-Insured Bounty system truly are.